Joshua Parker

Having defined an architectural language of bolt-on technological retrofits that apologise for an architecture's ecological crimes, it became necessary to realise this by upgrading my own home. This is my family home in Lincolnshire. Named “The Chedworth” by Persimmon Homes, it is a typical 3 bedroom detached cavity-wall new-build you will see across the UK. For my house to apologise for its annual operational carbon, it would require 10 350W PV Panels for electricity consumption, and another 28 to excuse the consumption of gas. For the embodied carbon within its construction, my house would require a further 24 solar panels if it were to apologise by 2050. To do this by 2030 in the UK, it would require a total of 152, to account for both the operational and embodied environmental crimes. Each year my family uses on average 124,000 litres of water. Given the UK rainfall data for Lincolnshire, my house would require an additional 110 sqm of gutters for the collection of rainwater in order to apologise for our consumption. The apology does not stop there. My house is poorly constructed. The windows are draughty and the house loses heat incredibly quickly. So, it has been wrapped in a straw bale blanket, contained behind a recycled polycarbonate skin. The south facing wall, without the bales, becomes a trombe wall.

Architecture is capable of more than just apologising for itself. It can be used to apologise for the environmental crimes of other industries or sectors too. The area surrounding Grimsby in North Lincolnshire has committed serious ecological offences. The industrial area to the North contains 2 CHP Power Stations that exclusively power 2 adjacent Oil Refineries. As part of the Humber Industrial Cluster, they help contribute 40% of the UK’s total industrial carbon emissions. Since being commissioned in 2005, VPI Immingham, just one of the 2 Power stations, would require 6.9 million PV Panels in order to apologise by 2050 for its historical operational carbon footprint.

The infrastructure needed to accommodate such a quantity becomes the principle drive behind the Master plan for Apologetic Architecture in Grimsby. The technological accoutrements are split into a mix of wind based and solar based remedies given the locations climatic data. Lightweight timber frames comprised of birch, sitka spruce and scots pine, are directly bolted onto the existing infrastructure of the Docks to facilitate the reorientation of the pitched roofs, optimising the amount of static wind turbines and PV Panels that will function at their most efficient.

These structural upgrades enable the apology to transcend from something ecological to something social. The repair of broken roofs alongside the protective recycled polycarbonate skin becomes the initial provision for programmatic reactivation of the currently vacant infrastructure.

It is image-based market competition that drives a second apology present in the Master Plan of Grimsby Docks. At its most prolific, Grimsby Docks was the largest fishing port in the world. Since records began Grimsby’s fishing industry has fished 1.7 billion fish - a significant contribution to over-fishing. The industry has since shifted to fish processing, and at a significantly reduced revenue.

To apologise, The Grimsby Dock Company are to line the jetties of the docks with 700W red LED lights, the very same lights that trawlers of today use to lure fish to be caught - except here, the lights are to lure the fish away from the nets, to the safety of Grimsby’s coastal waters.

Conspicuous compassion.